What little I have read of President Donald Trump He isn't interested in being a King.
Ifeel like He wants to be a Dictator .

You should start by getting some help for your TDS.

If you think he's acting like a dictator, you must have missed most of the Biden Regime.

Does He know He was elected to Serve The People of the USA?

This is a question you should be asking the Democrats. They are the ones who have been acting like they are our rulers.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/32)
* Origin: bbs.CabanaBar.net:11123 (1:142/999)

poindexter FORTRAN wrote to jimmylogan <=-

jimmylogan wrote to Alan Ianson <=-

I think it elections that Donald wants to do away with.

I haven't found proof that he has a plan to eliminate elections
entirely. What is clear: he has stated he wants major changes
to how elections are run (for example, new citizenship proof
requirements, ending mail-in ballots, tighter controls).

The fact that he didn't respect the 2020 election results and incited
an insurrection to overturn the election was our first clue.

You're right that he didn't respect the 2020 results - but that's
not new in politics. We've had candidates dispute outcomes before
(think "hanging chads"), so it's not unique to him.


As for "inciting an insurrection," I'm not personally convinced
he intended for anything violent to happen. I wasn't there,
and none of us really know the mindset of every person who showed
up or what pushed them individually. That part is still debated
and may be for a long time.

Trump telling people before the 2024 election "vote for me and you'll
never have to vote again" was the second clue.

I took that the same way I did when he said it: campaign rhetoric.
Every candidate exaggerates during election season. He doesn't have
the power to end elections any more than any other president would.





... Cannot format Drive A:... Formatting Drive C: instead
--- MultiMail/Mac v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: jimmylogan to poindexter FORTRAN on Thu Nov 20 2025 13:15:41

You're right that he didn't respect the 2020 results - but that's
not new in politics. We've had candidates dispute outcomes before
(think "hanging chads"), so it's not unique to him.

As for "inciting an insurrection," I'm not personally convinced
he intended for anything violent to happen. I wasn't there,
and none of us really know the mindset of every person who showed
up or what pushed them individually. That part is still debated
and may be for a long time.

He respected them as much as HRC did in 2016. While he was *much* more vocal about it, she did just as much to undermine the process by introducing the "collusion" boogey-man into the public mind.

The issue I have with him and 1/6 is real simple. It really doesn't matter what he told the crowd. The fact that he decided to hold a "loser's rally" on the day that the votes were being certified, in the same city, *and* supposedly (by his own admission) asked for more police because he thought it might get
violent, is more than enough for me. The fact that he continues to deny any culpability for what happened is just icing.

If he'd held his rally at Mara Lago and the violence in DC still happened, maybe it isn't his fault. If he'd dome *nothing* on that day, as some of his adivisors were suggesting he should do, maybe it isn't his fault. Holding a rally on the same day, in the same city -- something that even sore losers HRC and Gore didn't do -- makes it something he at the very least shares blame for. ---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Dumas Walker to jimmylogan on Fri Nov 21 2025 09:26 am

The issue I have with him and 1/6 is real simple. It really doesn't
matter what he told the crowd.

it absolutely does matter what he told the crowd. and it's important what
he wasn't allowed to do when things got out of hand.

The fact that he decided to hold
a "loser's rally" on the day that the votes were being certified,
in the same city,

why wouldn't he hold it there? that's the best place to have it.

*and* supposedly (by his own admission) asked
for more police because he thought it might get violent, is more
than enough for me. The fact that he continues to deny any
culpability for what happened is just icing.

i guess you forgot about everything that was happening. people liked to
riot. antifa members were all over. one guy got 70k for a video he shot and
he was a big antifa guy. pretending to be a maga. they say there's no proof but there's video and photo proof. also fbi agents were in the crowd causing problems. trump's speeches were edited by the media.

democrats were playing dirty.

if trump wanted a insurrection he could have done it and done it well.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Dumas Walker wrote to jimmylogan <=-

He respected them as much as HRC did in 2016. While he was *much* more vocal about it, she did just as much to undermine the process by introducing the "collusion" boogey-man into the public mind.

Yeah - glad we agree it's not just a "Trump thing." :-)

The issue I have with him and 1/6 is real simple. It really doesn't matter what he told the crowd. The fact that he decided to hold a "loser's rally" on the day that the votes were being certified, in the same city, *and* supposedly (by his own admission) asked for more
police because he thought it might get violent, is more than enough for me. The fact that he continues to deny any culpability for what
happened is just icing.

On the 1/6 point, I get what you're saying. I've never been, but I'd
think there's enough room in D.C. for different groups to hold rallies
at the same time. It might not have been the smartest move, but I don't
think that alone makes him automatically guilty. People still have to
be responsible for their own actions.

And who knows - maybe he really did think the Dems would bail out anyone arrested, like other cities. LOL

If he'd held his rally at Mara Lago and the violence in DC still
happened, maybe it isn't his fault. If he'd dome *nothing* on that
day, as some of his adivisors were suggesting he should do, maybe it
isn't his fault. Holding a rally on the same day, in the same city -- something that even sore losers HRC and Gore didn't do -- makes it something he at the very least shares blame for. ---

As for the timing and location: fair point. If he'd stayed at Mar-a-Lago
or done nothing that day, his level of blame would look different.
Holding a rally in the same city on the same day certainly looks bad,
and I can see why folks think he shares some blame for the
environment it created.

I can only say that I wouldn't have done it. I've avoided cities
where protests were planned - that['s just not something I want
to be around. :-)




... Support bacteria. It's the only culture some people are exposed to!
--- MultiMail/Mac v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: jimmylogan to poindexter FORTRAN on Thu Nov 20 2025 01:15 pm

You're right that he didn't respect the 2020 results - but that's
not new in politics. We've had candidates dispute outcomes before
(think "hanging chads"), so it's not unique to him.

As for "inciting an insurrection," I'm not personally convinced
he intended for anything violent to happen. I wasn't there,
and none of us really know the mindset of every person who showed
up or what pushed them individually. That part is still debated
and may be for a long time.

2020 is a weird case because the left spent all year burning down the streets, politicians were exercising open insubordination towards the Federal government, and when a small bunch of dudes assaulted the Capitol everybody was freaking about them because "domestic terrorists" and "OMG insurrection".

I mean, by that point you don't get to complain about insurrection because you are as much of an insurrector. Probably bigger.


--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken

---
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Arelor to jimmylogan on Wed Nov 26 2025 06:09 am

2020 is a weird case because the left spent all year burning down
the streets, politicians were exercising open insubordination
towards the Federal government, and when a small bunch of dudes
assaulted the Capitol everybody was freaking about them because
"domestic terrorists" and "OMG insurrection".

I mean, by that point you don't get to complain about insurrection
because you are as much of an insurrector. Probably bigger.

also at our jan 6th thing there was a lot of trouble makers that were batting for the other team and also fbi agents. i've seen some weird videos where i think it's either antifa or a gov agent trying to make people break laws or go further with what they were doing.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

jimmylogan wrote to Dumas Walker <=-

On the 1/6 point, I get what you're saying. I've never been, but I'd
think there's enough room in D.C. for different groups to hold rallies
at the same time. It might not have been the smartest move, but I don't think that alone makes him automatically guilty. People still have to
be responsible for their own actions.

On 1/6, Trump said, "I think right here, we're
going to walk down to the Capitol, and we're going to cheer on our
brave senators and congressmen and women, and we're probably not going
to be cheering so much for some of them."

Before that, he'd said "We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like
hell, you're not going to have a country anymore," he said.


--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
þ Synchronet þ .: realitycheckbbs.org :: scientia potentia est :.

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: poindexter FORTRAN to jimmylogan on Wed Nov 26 2025 07:16 am

to the Capitol, and we're going to cheer on our brave senators
and congressmen and women, and we're probably not going to be
cheering so much for some of them."

Before that, he'd said "We fight like hell. And if you don't fight
like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore," he said.

so what?
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: jimmylogan to Dumas Walker on Tue Nov 25 2025 20:37:23

I can only say that I wouldn't have done it. I've avoided cities
where protests were planned - that['s just not something I want
to be around. :-)

Indeed! I would also try avoiding them.
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Dumas Walker <=-

These are strange times. Barack Obama averaged 35 orders per year
during his terms. Donald Trump 45, 55 per year - mostly overturning egislation
that Obama passed.

You're ignorance is showing. You must have failed the Civics class in high school.

All Trump can do is sign an Executive Order. An EO only has the power to direct a gov't agency to do something. Those gov't agencies are officially under the Executive Branch - so he **is** the boss.

An EO cannot "overturn legislation". Ex: Trump can't eliminate the useless Dept. of Education since Congress created it. But since the Dept. of Education is a gov't agency, he does have the power to defund it and get rid of people with in it.

Trump's attempts to circumvent laws passed under Obama. On Trump's
second term, Trump has signed 217 orders, with an obedient majority in
the house and senate.

It takes a lot of work to undo the total mess that the Elitists have created over the last few decades.

And if he had an "obedient majority" why was the gov't shut down for over a month?


... Wife to sleeping spouse: "Wake up! Who the hell is Tina!!?"
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Dr. What to poindexter FORTRAN on Fri Nov 28 2025 09:57 am

to defund it and get rid of people with in it.

Trump's attempts to circumvent laws passed under Obama. On Trump's second term, Trump has signed 217 orders, with an obedient majority
in the house and senate.

It takes a lot of work to undo the total mess that the Elitists
have created over the last few decades.

And if he had an "obedient majority" why was the gov't shut down for
over a month?

one thing i noticed about piondexter is he totally stopped talking about
biden because there's no defending that situation. but he will still take shots at trump and parrot cnn headlines. i won't ever vote democrat again because there's braindead people like this in their ranks.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Yeah, IMHO, the executive order is not inherently a bad thing if it is used correctly. It should be used as a stop-gap measure, until
Congress can pass a law, or in emergencies only. With recent Presidents, it is becoming more a way to create "law" without going through the proper channels, and hoping that Congress and the courts don't question it.

These are strange times. Barack Obama averaged 35 orders per year
during his terms. Donald Trump 45, 55 per year - mostly overturning egislation
that Obama passed. Biden averaged 41 per year , again, undoing some of
Trump's attempts to circumvent laws passed under Obama. On Trump's
second term, Trump has signed 217 orders, with an obedient majority in
the house and senate.

Strange indeed. Keeping in mind that the other three cite per year
averages, it will be interesting to see what Trump-2's average is at the
end of 4 years vs. just the first one... it will be *at least* 54.25/year, which is higher than Obama or Biden's average, so not good.

Having a mostly-obedient majority is a way to make sure that at least
Congress is less likely to question any particular order.


* SLMR 2.1a * SYSOP (sih' sawp) n. The guy laughing at your typing.
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Arelor wrote to jimmylogan <=-

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: jimmylogan to poindexter FORTRAN on Thu Nov 20 2025 01:15 pm

You're right that he didn't respect the 2020 results - but that's
not new in politics. We've had candidates dispute outcomes before
(think "hanging chads"), so it's not unique to him.

As for "inciting an insurrection," I'm not personally convinced
he intended for anything violent to happen. I wasn't there,
and none of us really know the mindset of every person who showed
up or what pushed them individually. That part is still debated
and may be for a long time.

2020 is a weird case because the left spent all year burning down the streets, politicians were exercising open insubordination towards the Federal government, and when a small bunch of dudes assaulted the
Capitol everybody was freaking about them because "domestic terrorists" and "OMG insurrection".

I mean, by that point you don't get to complain about insurrection
because you are as much of an insurrector. Probably bigger.

I don't disagree... I almost brought up the burnings and the killings
and such. Kinda odd that that's okay because it's not "DC" you know?


... Support bacteria. It's the only culture some people are exposed to!
--- MultiMail/Mac v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

poindexter FORTRAN wrote to jimmylogan <=-

jimmylogan wrote to Dumas Walker <=-

On the 1/6 point, I get what you're saying. I've never been, but I'd
think there's enough room in D.C. for different groups to hold rallies
at the same time. It might not have been the smartest move, but I don't think that alone makes him automatically guilty. People still have to
be responsible for their own actions.

On 1/6, Trump said, "I think right here, we're
going to walk down to the Capitol, and we're going to cheer on our
brave senators and congressmen and women, and we're probably not going
to be cheering so much for some of them."

Before that, he'd said "We fight like hell. And if you don't fight
like
hell, you're not going to have a country anymore," he said.

Walk down to the Capitol and cheer on some and not others. No violence mentioned.

"Fight" can mean fighting at the polls, fighting for rights in court,
etc. Again, not specifically fisticuffs.

And again, I wasn't there, but I'm pretty sure he didn't bus in people
to protest and provide bricks to throw...



... I put a dollar in one of those change machines...nothing changed.
--- MultiMail/Mac v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

I mean, by that point you don't get to complain about insurrection because you are as much of an insurrector. Probably bigger.

I don't disagree... I almost brought up the burnings and the killings
and such. Kinda odd that that's okay because it's not "DC" you know?

My potentially faulty memory is that some of that activity did indeed
happen in DC, just not at the Capital Building.


* SLMR 2.1a * Sorcerer parking only. Violators will be toad.
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

jimmylogan wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-

And again, I wasn't there, but I'm pretty sure he didn't bus in people
to protest and provide bricks to throw...

https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2021/10/details-of-the-money-behind-jan-6-protests-continue-to-emerge/


--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
þ Synchronet þ .: realitycheckbbs.org :: scientia potentia est :.

jimmylogan wrote to Arelor <=-

I don't disagree... I almost brought up the burnings and the killings
and such. Kinda odd that that's okay because it's not "DC" you know?

Which killing? George Floyd? Breonna Taylor? The people that Kyle
Rittenhouse killed?

You're comparing protests against systemic racism with a violent protest attempting to disrupt an election.



--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
þ Synchronet þ .: realitycheckbbs.org :: scientia potentia est :.

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: poindexter FORTRAN to jimmylogan on Thu Dec 04 2025 07:01 am

jimmylogan wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-

And again, I wasn't there, but I'm pretty sure he didn't bus in
people to protest and provide bricks to throw...

https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2021/10/details-of-the-mone y-behind-jan-6-protests-continue-to-emerge/

fbi
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: poindexter FORTRAN to jimmylogan on Thu Dec 04 2025 07:01 am

Which killing? George Floyd? Breonna Taylor? The people that Kyle Rittenhouse killed?

you can't really call them people.
one guy abused his grandmother, the other guy raped 2 twin boys in the ass. also it was self defense.

are you against the deaths of pedophiles?
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

I don't disagree... I almost brought up the burnings and the killings and such. Kinda odd that that's okay because it's not "DC" you know?

Which killing? George Floyd? Breonna Taylor? The people that Kyle
Rittenhouse killed?

Maybe the one where the "protesters" killed the off-duty (and black) security guard? Or maybe the 16-y/o that got shot dead in Seattle's CHOP/CHAZ? Or
the 19-y/o killed there?

I question why Kyle was there instead of the real cops (who apparently
couldn't be bothered) or the National Guard, but I have 0% doubt at all that
if he'd not shot those people "dead Kyle Rittenhouse" would be in my list above.

You're comparing protests against systemic racism with a violent protest attempting to disrupt an election.

Why does that matter? Violent protests are violent protests. Both were
wrong, but only a few of us are willing to admit that because the rest are
too busy with their defending "my side" of the political poles BS -- "Jan 6
was bad but Summer 2020 was necessary," or vise versa. Both are wrong.


* SLMR 2.1a * Dijon vu: The feeling you've tasted this mustard before
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Dumas Walker wrote to POINDEXTER FORTRAN <=-

I don't disagree... I almost brought up the burnings and the killings and such. Kinda odd that that's okay because it's not "DC" you know?

Which killing? George Floyd? Breonna Taylor? The people that Kyle Rittenhouse killed?

Maybe the one where the "protesters" killed the off-duty (and black) security guard? Or maybe the 16-y/o that got shot dead in Seattle's CHOP/CHAZ? Or the 19-y/o killed there?

Don't forget the one where a large group of lefty thugs completely took
over a few city blocks in Seattle, for days, and eventually burned down
the Police Station there. Similar things in Portland.

I question why Kyle was there instead of the real cops (who apparently couldn't be bothered) or the National Guard, but I have 0% doubt at all that if he'd not shot those people "dead Kyle Rittenhouse" would be in
my list above.

No doubt about that.

You're comparing protests against systemic racism with a violent protest attempting to disrupt an election.

Why does that matter? Violent protests are violent protests. Both
were wrong, but only a few of us are willing to admit that because the rest are too busy with their defending "my side" of the political poles
BS -- "Jan 6 was bad but Summer 2020 was necessary," or vise versa.
Both are wrong.

In the eyes of TDS-Lefties like the one you are talking to, that whole
"BLM / Antifa" bullshit was "necessary". The "my side" is the only
thing those people know.




... "I'm a lawyer." "Honest?" "No, the regular kind."
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Dumas Walker to POINDEXTER FORTRAN on Fri Dec 05 2025 11:27 am

I question why Kyle was there instead of the real cops (who
apparently couldn't be bothered) or the National Guard, but I have
0% doubt at all that if he'd not shot those people "dead Kyle
Rittenhouse" would be in my list above.

There were 125 national guard and police AND people who were defending their own streets and people were defending properties. rittenhouse was there defending a used car dealership. police also thanked him and other people for helping out.

imagine that hundreds of people, probably more came from your area and
outside your area to cause problems and attack people on the street and burn businesses. this is literally what happened. This is the area where i was living and I worked in kenosha during that time.

there's only so many police. as an american you have a right to defend
order.

Rittenhouse ended the riots. that is literally what happened. shooting those 3 pieces of shit sent a message. also our shitty gov brought in more nationalguard making it around 500. then the people with the burnt down businesses got tickets the next week from the city. have to have it cleaned
up asap.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Gamgee to Dumas Walker on Fri Dec 05 2025 16:13:35

Dumas Walker wrote to POINDEXTER FORTRAN <=-

I don't disagree... I almost brought up the burnings and the killings and such. Kinda odd that that's okay because it's not "DC" you know?

Which killing? George Floyd? Breonna Taylor? The people that Kyle Rittenhouse killed?

Maybe the one where the "protesters" killed the off-duty (and black) security guard? Or maybe the 16-y/o that got shot dead in Seattle's CHOP/CHAZ? Or the 19-y/o killed there?

Don't forget the one where a large group of lefty thugs completely took
over a few city blocks in Seattle, for days, and eventually burned down
the Police Station there. Similar things in Portland.

I question why Kyle was there instead of the real cops (who apparently couldn't be bothered) or the National Guard, but I have 0% doubt at all that if he'd not shot those people "dead Kyle Rittenhouse" would be in my list above.

No doubt about that.

You're comparing protests against systemic racism with a violent protest attempting to disrupt an election.

Why does that matter? Violent protests are violent protests. Both were wrong, but only a few of us are willing to admit that because the rest are too busy with their defending "my side" of the political poles BS -- "Jan 6 was bad but Summer 2020 was necessary," or vise versa. Both are wrong.

In the eyes of TDS-Lefties like the one you are talking to, that whole
"BLM / Antifa" bullshit was "necessary". The "my side" is the only
thing those people know.

... "I'm a lawyer." "Honest?" "No, the regular kind."

Not our fault the president fulfills almost all 14 points of fascism lol
ANTIFA is an ideology, not a group. Everyone sensible is anti-fascist, because the only alternative is fascist...

---
þ Synchronet þ The LNRC-IN Official BBS

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Logic44 to Gamgee on Fri Dec 05 2025 11:17 pm

Not our fault the president fulfills almost all 14 points of fascism lol ANTIFA is an ideology, not a group. Everyone sensible is anti-fascist, because the only alternative is fascist...

There's a cemetery where at least 8,466 ANTIFA are buried. It's just across the river from the White House.

...It works better if you plug it in.

---
þ Synchronet þ War Ensemble BBS - The sport is war, total war - warensemble.com

Dumas Walker wrote to POINDEXTER FORTRAN <=-

I don't disagree... I almost brought up the burnings and the killings and such. Kinda odd that that's okay because it's not "DC" you know?

Which killing? George Floyd? Breonna Taylor? The people that Kyle Rittenhouse killed?

Maybe the one where the "protesters" killed the off-duty (and black) security guard? Or maybe the 16-y/o that got shot dead in Seattle's CHOP/CHAZ? Or the 19-y/o killed there?

Don't forget the one where a large group of lefty thugs completely took
over a few city blocks in Seattle, for days, and eventually burned down
the Police Station there. Similar things in Portland.

I didn't forget. That is what the CHOP/CHAZ was called. One of those two murders remains unsolved, IMHO mainly because local government left the area
to anarchy and "voices being heard." The 19 year old was killed by another protestor. 16-year-old Antonio Mays was apparently shot by the CHOP's self-appointed security force but no one has ever been charged. There is a civil trial about to start, or that has just started.

The murder of Mays is what forced Seattle to finally start upholding the law and to take those blocks back over.


* SLMR 2.1a * It's a cookbook! It's a cookbook!
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Not our fault the president fulfills almost all 14 points of fascism lol ANTIFA is an ideology, not a group. Everyone sensible is anti-fascist, because
the only alternative is fascist...

No, it is both an ideology and a group.

The ideology is what most of us sensibile people agree with.

The group, or "movement," if you will, is actually a bunch of decentralized "groups." They claim to be anti-fascist (and some groups might be) but in reality seem much more to be anti-capitalist and either pro-social/communist
or pro-anarchy. They claim to be non-violent but have proven otherwise.

The movement is what most sensibile people *disagree* with.


* SLMR 2.1a * 9 out of 10 men who try camels prefer women.
---
þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

Dumas Walker wrote to GAMGEE <=-

Dumas Walker wrote to POINDEXTER FORTRAN <=-

I don't disagree... I almost brought up the burnings and the

killings

and such. Kinda odd that that's okay because it's not "DC" you know?

Which killing? George Floyd? Breonna Taylor? The people that Kyle Rittenhouse killed?

Maybe the one where the "protesters" killed the off-duty (and black) security guard? Or maybe the 16-y/o that got shot dead in Seattle's CHOP/CHAZ? Or the 19-y/o killed there?

Don't forget the one where a large group of lefty thugs completely took
over a few city blocks in Seattle, for days, and eventually burned down
the Police Station there. Similar things in Portland.

I didn't forget. That is what the CHOP/CHAZ was called. One of those
two murders remains unsolved, IMHO mainly because local government left the area to anarchy and "voices being heard." The 19 year old was
killed by another protestor. 16-year-old Antonio Mays was apparently
shot by the CHOP's self-appointed security force but no one has ever
been charged. There is a civil trial about to start, or that has just started.

The murder of Mays is what forced Seattle to finally start upholding
the law and to take those blocks back over.

Ahhhhh.... OK good. Didn't know the CHOP/CHAZ names. I have heard that Seattle has really turned into a leftist sewage pit. Thanks.




... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Dumas Walker wrote to LOGIC44 <=-

Not our fault the president fulfills almost all 14 points of fascism lol ANTIFA is an ideology, not a group. Everyone sensible is anti-fascist,

because

the only alternative is fascist...

No, it is both an ideology and a group.

The ideology is what most of us sensibile people agree with.

Absolutely correct.

The group, or "movement," if you will, is actually a bunch of decentralized "groups." They claim to be anti-fascist (and some groups might be) but in reality seem much more to be anti-capitalist and
either pro-social/communist or pro-anarchy. They claim to be
non-violent but have proven otherwise.

Yes.

The movement is what most sensibile people *disagree* with.

Indeed. Except for the radical lefties that use it as a cover and then
play dumb when it's talked about. Like a few folks in this very echo.




... All hope abandon, ye who enter messages here.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

nationalguard making it around 500. then the people with the burnt down businesses got tickets the next week from the city. have to have it cleaned up asap.

Yeah I remember that. That was some real BS. Why charge the responsible parties for the destruction when you can just fine the victims instead? :(


* SLMR 2.1a * Justice is lost, Justice is raped, Justice is gone.
---
þ Synchronet þ Capitol City Test System

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Dumas Walker to LOGIC44 on Sat Dec 06 2025 10:37:13

If we refer to Umberto Eco's 14 points of fascism, we can see how Trump embodies a majority of them. A quick note: Meeting only one or two of these is not what makes one a fascist. However, it's a lot easier to make the argument when they embody almost all of them...

Most of the ANTIFA violence I've seen is provoked by fascists or fascist ajdacent actors, meaning most of what I've seen is pretty much self-defense.
Right wing political violence is, statistically speaking, MUCH more prevalent than left wing violence.

---
þ Synchronet þ The LNRC-IN Official BBS

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: DaiTengu to Logic44 on Sat Dec 06 2025 10:50:11

My point exactly...

By some people's logic, D-Day was a terrorist invasion of a soveiregn nation, and we call those people sympathizers.

---
þ Synchronet þ The LNRC-IN Official BBS

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Logic44 to Dumas Walker on Sat Dec 06 2025 02:56 pm

Right wing political violence is, statistically speaking, MUCH more prevalent than left wing violence.

What in the hell are you smoking?

---
þ Synchronet þ TIRED of waiting 2 hours for a taco? GO TO TACOPRONTO.bbs.io

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Bf2k+ to Logic44 on Sat Dec 06 2025 16:09:13

Statistics, my friend.

Even the FBI statistics prove this.

---
þ Synchronet þ The LNRC-IN Official BBS

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Gamgee to Dumas Walker on Sat Dec 06 2025 13:09:21

Was D-Day a terrorist invasion?

---
þ Synchronet þ The LNRC-IN Official BBS

Logic44 wrote to Gamgee <=-

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Gamgee to Dumas Walker on Sat Dec 06 2025 13:09:21

Was D-Day a terrorist invasion?

No.

Will you please fuck off?


... Ignorance can be cured. Stupid is forever.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Logic44 to Bf2k+ on Sat Dec 06 2025 08:41 pm

Statistics, my friend.

Even the FBI statistics prove this.

you should quote the message you're responding to so we know WTF you're talking about.
and also maybe cite the FBI stats with a website showing what you're saying is factual.


... Your Proctologist called, he's found your head.

---
þ Synchronet þ the Outwest BBS - outwest.synchro.net - Home of BBSBASE 6.0

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: DaiTengu to Logic44 on Sat Dec 06 2025 10:50 am

There's a cemetery where at least 8,466 ANTIFA are buried. It's just
across the river from the White House.

i think you have it mixed up. antifa are modern day terrorists.
if you ever had to deal with them you wouldn't look up to them.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Dumas Walker to LOGIC44 on Sat Dec 06 2025 10:37 am

No, it is both an ideology and a group.

The ideology is what most of us sensibile people agree with.

The group, or "movement," if you will, is actually a bunch of

it's like 'anonymous'

it's a bunch of punks. nothing else.
it's loosly knit but there is a command structure. they get the idiots
to do the dirty work.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Dumas Walker to MRO on Sat Dec 06 2025 09:50 am

nationalguard making it around 500. then the people with
the burnt down businesses got tickets the next week from the city.
have to have it cleaned up asap.

Yeah I remember that. That was some real BS. Why charge the
responsible parties for the destruction when you can just fine the
victims instead? :(

because it would be racist to go after the responsible parties!
that's what you get when you vote democrat.

the dealership that had all the cars destroyed was waiting on an insurance company rep to come by and try to get vins. the city didnt care.

in that area there were bricks left out too. in my home city which is by kenosha they hid them on main street the day before.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Logic44 to Dumas Walker on Sat Dec 06 2025 02:56 pm

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Dumas Walker to LOGIC44 on Sat Dec 06 2025 10:37:13

If we refer to Umberto Eco's 14 points of fascism, we can see how
Trump embodies a majority of them. A quick note: Meeting only one or
two of these is not what makes one a fascist. However, it's a lot

that sounds like the gayest shit i've heard in a long time.

if trump is a facist, lets have more of that. he's doing a better job than the last 4 presidents.

Most of the ANTIFA violence I've seen is provoked by fascists
or fascist ajdacent actors, meaning most of what I've seen is pretty

by seen do you mean when you watch cnn?

you dont provoke violence. these people were fucking animals who hurt good people.

much self-defense. Right wing political violence is, statistically
speaking, MUCH more prevalent than left wing violence.

i'm sure you cried over the rapist that rittenhouse shot.

also that's the most delusional shit i've ever seen. you are really
off your rocker today, random dude.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Bf2k+ to Logic44 on Sat Dec 06 2025 04:09 pm

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Logic44 to Dumas Walker on Sat Dec 06 2025 02:56 pm

Right wing political violence is, statistically speaking, MUCH more prevalent than left wing violence.

What in the hell are you smoking?

exactly. we've had years of 'left wing' people burning businesses, attacking people and drawing swastikas on everything.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Logic44 to Bf2k+ on Sat Dec 06 2025 08:41 pm

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Bf2k+ to Logic44 on Sat Dec 06 2025 16:09:13

Statistics, my friend.

is that a new word for crack cocaine?

Even the FBI statistics prove this.

oh yeah they are someone to be trusted. the cia too!
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Denn to Logic44 on Sat Dec 06 2025 22:41:32



****************************************
Every good wizard needs a wand, so I carved a Glock and loaded it with
DEATHLY HOLLOWS.

---
þ Synchronet þ The LNRC-IN Official BBS

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Denn to Logic44 on Sat Dec 06 2025 22:41:32


https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/118612/documents/HHRG-119-JU00-20250917-SD057-U57.pdf
****************************************
Every good wizard needs a wand, so I carved a Glock and loaded it with
DEATHLY HOLLOWS.

---
þ Synchronet þ The LNRC-IN Official BBS

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Gamgee to Logic44 on Sat Dec 06 2025 22:17:44

Logic44 wrote to Gamgee <=-

Re: Re: Our President doesn't
By: Gamgee to Dumas Walker on Sat Dec 06 2025 13:09:21

Was D-Day a terrorist invasion?

No.

Will you please fuck off?

... Ignorance can be cured. Stupid is forever.

Not until you substantiate the claim you made using actual data. ****************************************
Every good wizard needs a wand, so I carved a Glock and loaded it with
DEATHLY HOLLOWS.

---
þ Synchronet þ The LNRC-IN Official BBS